The structure of Hajj in fiqh discourse is a deliberative study

Abstract

 The Hajj structure in the Fiqh discourse is one of the most important topics that stand out in the convergence of contemporary linguistics and Islamic studies. The Fiqh discourse, with its inferences, judgments and practical responses, is not just a delivery of evidence or a presentation of fatwas, but a kind of convincing argumentative dialogue, based on complex linguistic premises, goals and methods. Here the importance of using a modern approach that addresses this discourse as a means of linguistic communication aimed at influencing and persuading, and not just a gathering of information or a parade of opinions, is shown.

The research structure consists of five interrelated chapters:

 The first chapter: conceptual and theoretical framework: deals with the definition of pilgrims and how it developed from rhetoric to deliberative, clarifying the basic concepts in deliberative linguistics (context, speech acts, intentionality), then defines the Fiqh discourse and its characteristics.

Chapter Two: the Hajj structure in the Fiqh discourse: analyzes the basic elements of the pilgrims (parties, introductions, methods) and the means used by the jurist such as texts, transmission and measurement, and then reviews the Hajj format in terms of organizing the argument and building weights.

Chapter Three: deliberative strategies in fiqh discourse: examines the actions of speech within the texts of jurisprudence, analyzes the role of deliberative and deliberate assumptions, focusing on the diversity of recipients (common people, science students, hardworking) and its impact on the formulation of discourse.

 Chapter IV: Applied Studies: includes an analysis of the arguments of Imam al-Nawawi and Ibn Qudamah, and a comparison between educational and slanderous discourse to clarify the deliberative tools and methods to build the argument in each of them.

 Chapter five: conclusions and recommendations: concludes that the Fiqh discourse adopts a clear deliberative dialectical structure, and that the tools of deliberative linguistics contribute to a more accurate understanding of it.The research recommends integrating these approaches into university education and legitimate language studies.